Donald J. Trump called
on Monday for the United States to bar all Muslims from entering the
country until the nation’s leaders can “figure out what is going on”
after the terrorist attacks in San Bernardino, Calif., an extraordinary
escalation of rhetoric aimed at voters’ fears about members of the
Islamic faith.
A prohibition of
Muslims – an unprecedented proposal by a leading American presidential
candidate, and an idea more typically associated with hate groups –
reflects a progression of mistrust that is rooted in ideology as much as
politics.
Mr. Trump, who in September declared “I love the Muslims,” turned sharply against them after the Paris terrorist attacks, calling for a database to track Muslims in America and repeating discredited rumors
that thousands of Muslims celebrated in New Jersey on 9/11. His poll
numbers rose largely as a result, until a setback in Iowa on Monday
morning. Hours later Mr. Trump called for the ban, fitting his pattern
of making stunning comments when his lead in the Republican presidential
field appears in jeopardy.
Saying that “hatred”
among many Muslims for Americans is “beyond comprehension,” Mr. Trump
said in a statement that the United States needed to confront “where
this hatred comes from and why.”
“Until we are able to
determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses,
our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that
believe only in jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human
life,” Mr. Trump said.
Asked what prompted his statement, Mr. Trump said, “death,” according to a spokeswoman.
Repudiation of Mr. Trump’s remarks was swift and severe among religious groups and politicians from both parties.
Mr. Trump is “unhinged,” said one Republican rival, former Gov. Jeb
Bush of Florida, while another, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida, called
the ban “offensive and outlandish.” Hillary Clinton said the idea was
“reprehensible, prejudiced and divisive.” Organizations representing
Jews, Christians and those of other faiths quickly joined Muslims in
denouncing Mr. Trump’s proposal.
“Rooting our nation’s
immigration policy in religious bigotry and discrimination will not make
America great again,” said Rabbi Jack Moline, executive director of
Interfaith Alliance, putting a twist on Mr. Trump’s campaign slogan.
Mr. Trump made his remarks a day after President Obama delivered a national address from the Oval Office urging Americans not to turn against Muslims in the wake of the terrorist attacks.
Experts on immigration law and policy expressed shock at the proposal Monday afternoon.
“This is just so
antithetical to the history of the United States,” said Nancy Morawetz, a
professor of clinical law at New York University School of Law, who
specializes in immigration. “It’s unbelievable to have a religious test
for admission into the country.”
She added: “I cannot recall any historical precedent for denying immigration based on religion.”
Putting the policy
into practice would require an unlikely act of Congress, said Stephen
Yale-Loehr, a professor of law at Cornell and a prominent authority on
immigration.
Should Congress enact
such a law, he predicted, the Supreme Court would invalidate it as an
overly restrictive immigration policy under the equal protection clause
of the 14th Amendment.
“It would certainly be challenged as unconstitutional,” he said. “And I predict the Supreme Court would strike it down.”
Mr. Trump has a track
record of making surprising and even extreme comments whenever he is
overtaken in opinion polls by other Republican candidates – as happened
on Monday just hours before he issued his statement about Muslims. A new
Monmouth University survey of likely Iowa Republican caucus-goers found
that Mr. Trump had slipped from his recent top spot in the state, which
holds the first presidential nomination contest on Feb. 1. According to
the poll, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas earned 24 percent of support, while
Mr. Trump had 19 percent and Senator Marco Rubio of Florida had 17
percent. But another Iowa poll released on Monday, by CNN/OCR, showed
Mr. Trump with a comfortable lead but Mr. Cruz gaining ground on him.
Mr. Trump, who boasts about his strong poll numbers at the beginning of virtually every campaign speech, launched an unusually stinging attack
against Ben Carson, another Republican candidate, when Mr. Carson took a
lead in Iowa polls this fall; Mr. Trump, citing Mr. Carson’s memoir
about his sometimes-violent youth, called him “pathological” and
compared his state of mind to a child molester’s.
Several Republican
strategists and politicians said they believe that Mr. Trump’s maneuver
against Muslims was partly a challenge to Mr. Cruz and other Republicans
to stake out positions on terrorism that were as audacious as his own.
But they also said that the ban reflected anxiety and anger among many
voters that the federal government was not acting aggressively enough to
protect them at home.
“I think Trump’s idea
may be too strong, but I think something jarring is very helpful in
leading to a national debate in how big this problem is, and how
dangerous it is,” said Newt Gingrich, a former Republican speaker of the
House who ran for president in 2012. “Nine percent of Pakistanis agree
with ISIS, according to one poll. That’s a huge number. We need to put
all the burden of proof on people coming from those countries to show
that they are not a danger to us.”
Tens of thousands of
Muslims enter and stay in the United States each year as tourists or
through the immigration system, experts say, with an estimated 100,000
Muslims becoming United States permanent residents in 2012, according to
the Pew Research Center. The United States issued 680,000 green cards
to migrants from Muslim-majority countries in the five-year period from
fiscal year 2009 through fiscal year 2013, according to the Senate
Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and the National
Interest, which cited data from the Department of Homeland Security.
At a rally at the
U.S.S. Yorktown in South Carolina on Monday night, Mr. Trump drew
sustained cheers from the audience as he outlined his idea for the ban.
“We have no choice,”
Mr. Trump said. “Our country cannot be the victim of tremendous attacks
by people who believe only in jihad.”
While several
Republican presidential candidates have called for increased
intelligence gathering and more aggressive investigations of suspected
terrorists, as well as a halt to Muslim refugees entering the United
States from Syria, Mr. Trump’s pointed suspicions about Muslims have
been in a category by themselves.
At his campaign
rallies, he has drawn strong applause from thousands of voters for his
calls on the government to monitor mosques, and he has refused to rule
out his earlier proposal to enter names of Muslims in America into a
database. He has also made a series of ominous comments about President Obama’s leadership in fighting terrorism, suggesting that there was “something going on” with Mr. Obama that Americans were not aware of.
In his statement, Mr.
Trump quoted a poll by the Center for Security Policy, whose president
and founder, Frank Gaffney, has claimed that President Obama is aligned
with the Muslim Brotherhood, an extremist political movement born in
Egypt, and that agents of the Muslim Brotherhood have infiltrated the
U.S. government, the Republican Party and conservative political
organizations.
Barring non-citizen
Muslims from the United States has drawn support from organizations like
the Society of Americans for National Existence and the Daily Stormer,
which the Southern Poverty Law Center has described as hate groups.
The proposal drew
immediate condemnation from Muslim-Americans. Eboo Patel, the president
of Interfaith Youth Core, based in Chicago, said, “I’m standing in a
building right now where I am looking up at the Sears Tower, which was
designed by Fazlur Rahman Khan,” a structural engineer originally from
Bangladesh who was behind what is now known as the Willis Tower.
“What if we had barred
Russians from America because of the Cold War? Who would have invented
Google?” Mr. Patel asked, referring to Google’s co-founder, Sergey Brin.
While many critics of
Mr. Trump reassured themselves that neither he nor his idea would
ultimately go anywhere, they were aghast that a mainstream presidential
candidate would ever utter it.
“It would be
particularly bizarre,” said Ms. Morawetz, “to have an immigration test
based on religion given that the country was founded by people who were
fleeing religious persecution.”
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου