The State Department has deemed roughly 150 more of Hillary Clinton's
email messages to be classified, a move certain to fuel the roiling
controversy over her use of a private email server instead of an
official government account when she served as secretary of state.
The new classifications will more than triple the previous total of 63 classified messages on Clinton's account, but State Department spokesman Mark Toner stressed that the information was not marked classified at the time it was sent several years ago. He also said the decisions to classify the information did not represent a determination that it should have been marked or handled that way back then.
The new classifications will more than triple the previous total of 63 classified messages on Clinton's account, but State Department spokesman Mark Toner stressed that the information was not marked classified at the time it was sent several years ago. He also said the decisions to classify the information did not represent a determination that it should have been marked or handled that way back then.
"That certainly does not speak to whether it was classified at the
time it was sent, or forwarded, or received," Toner said during the
daily State Department briefing on Monday. "We stand by our contention
that the information we’ve upgraded was not marked classified at the
time it was sent."
Nearly all the information officially classified by the State Department in prior email releases involved diplomatic strategy or information provided by foreign governments. Toner batted away questions about whether State Department policy dictated that Clinton and other agency employees treat as classified information obtained in confidence from foreign officials or diplomats.
"Classification — we’ve said this many times — is not an exact science. It's not, often, a black-and-white process," Toner said. "There’s many strong opinions. … It's not up to me to litigate these kinds of questions from the State Department podium."
Nearly all the information officially classified by the State Department in prior email releases involved diplomatic strategy or information provided by foreign governments. Toner batted away questions about whether State Department policy dictated that Clinton and other agency employees treat as classified information obtained in confidence from foreign officials or diplomats.
"Classification — we’ve said this many times — is not an exact science. It's not, often, a black-and-white process," Toner said. "There’s many strong opinions. … It's not up to me to litigate these kinds of questions from the State Department podium."
The new classified designations came as the State Department prepared
to post more than 7,000 additional pages of Clinton's emails online.
The records were expected to go up on the agency's website at about 9
p.m. Monday.
Toner did not elaborate on the nighttime posting but stressed that the volume of messages being made public Monday exceeded the approximately 6,000 pages released thus far and would bring State back into line with targets set by a federal judge handling a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit for the records.
"We’re producing more documents this month than we have in the previous three releases in May, June and July combined," he told reporters. "Meeting this goal is really a testament to our commitment to releasing these emails to the public as expeditiously as possible."
The last nighttime release of Clinton's emails, in June, prompted questions of whether the State Department was trying to minimize the impact of bad news. State spokesman John Kirby on Monday denied that, saying that the timing was the product of the volume of emails to be processed and posted, and a monthly deadline set by a federal judge. However, Kirby apologized for the inconvenience the nighttime posting caused for journalists and said his agency would seek to avoid such off-hours activity in the future.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/clintonemail-batch4-213164#ixzz3kQnnHwBC
Toner did not elaborate on the nighttime posting but stressed that the volume of messages being made public Monday exceeded the approximately 6,000 pages released thus far and would bring State back into line with targets set by a federal judge handling a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit for the records.
"We’re producing more documents this month than we have in the previous three releases in May, June and July combined," he told reporters. "Meeting this goal is really a testament to our commitment to releasing these emails to the public as expeditiously as possible."
The last nighttime release of Clinton's emails, in June, prompted questions of whether the State Department was trying to minimize the impact of bad news. State spokesman John Kirby on Monday denied that, saying that the timing was the product of the volume of emails to be processed and posted, and a monthly deadline set by a federal judge. However, Kirby apologized for the inconvenience the nighttime posting caused for journalists and said his agency would seek to avoid such off-hours activity in the future.
The Intelligence Community inspector general has said at least two
emails on Clinton's account contained "top secret" information subject
to special protection because it was derived from electronic or aerial
surveillance. The State Department has disputed that conclusion. The FBI
is also conducting an investigation of how the arguably classified
material made it onto Clinton's server.
The classification issues have created a political and public relations controversy for Clinton — the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination — and have fueled questions about the wisdom of her opting to handle all her email traffic during her four years as America's top diplomat on a private email account and server housed at the home she shares with former President Bill Clinton in Chappaqua, N.Y.
Clinton, who insisted at the outset of the controversy in March that there was no classified information in her email, now says nothing was marked as classified at the time. She has also described the classification issues as the result of disputes between the State Department and other intelligence agencies. The Democratic presidential candidate's aides have also stressed that since classified information is not supposed to be sent to ordinary government email accounts or personal accounts, her use of a personal one isn't particularly relevant.
"If I had had a separate government account ... we would be going through the same process," Clinton told reporters earlier this month at a news conference in Las Vegas. "It has nothing to do with me and it has nothing to do with the fact that my account was personal."
While Clinton has repeatedly described the email controversy as one dwelled upon by journalists and her political opponents, she changed her tone somewhat last week, allowing that some members of the public do have legitimate questions about the issue. "I know people have raised questions about my email use as secretary of state, and I understand why," she said at a campaign stop in Iowa. "My use of personal email was allowed by the State Department. It clearly wasn’t the best choice. ... I take responsibility for that decision."
The emails set to be released Monday come from a set of about 54,000 pages of messages Clinton turned over to her former agency in December after a request from a top official there.
In May, the State Department released 847 pages from the emails relating to Benghazi and Libya more broadly that had been provided to the House Select Committee on Benghazi earlier in the year.
State initially proposed holding back the rest of Clinton's emails until next January and releasing them in one large batch in response to pending Freedom of Information Act requests. However, U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras rejected that approach and ordered monthly releases from June through early next year.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/clintonemail-batch4-213164#ixzz3kQnsrHzy
The classification issues have created a political and public relations controversy for Clinton — the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination — and have fueled questions about the wisdom of her opting to handle all her email traffic during her four years as America's top diplomat on a private email account and server housed at the home she shares with former President Bill Clinton in Chappaqua, N.Y.
Clinton, who insisted at the outset of the controversy in March that there was no classified information in her email, now says nothing was marked as classified at the time. She has also described the classification issues as the result of disputes between the State Department and other intelligence agencies. The Democratic presidential candidate's aides have also stressed that since classified information is not supposed to be sent to ordinary government email accounts or personal accounts, her use of a personal one isn't particularly relevant.
"If I had had a separate government account ... we would be going through the same process," Clinton told reporters earlier this month at a news conference in Las Vegas. "It has nothing to do with me and it has nothing to do with the fact that my account was personal."
While Clinton has repeatedly described the email controversy as one dwelled upon by journalists and her political opponents, she changed her tone somewhat last week, allowing that some members of the public do have legitimate questions about the issue. "I know people have raised questions about my email use as secretary of state, and I understand why," she said at a campaign stop in Iowa. "My use of personal email was allowed by the State Department. It clearly wasn’t the best choice. ... I take responsibility for that decision."
The emails set to be released Monday come from a set of about 54,000 pages of messages Clinton turned over to her former agency in December after a request from a top official there.
In May, the State Department released 847 pages from the emails relating to Benghazi and Libya more broadly that had been provided to the House Select Committee on Benghazi earlier in the year.
State initially proposed holding back the rest of Clinton's emails until next January and releasing them in one large batch in response to pending Freedom of Information Act requests. However, U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras rejected that approach and ordered monthly releases from June through early next year.
In June, State released 3,095 pages, many of which highlighted the influence of outside Clinton adviser Sidney Blumenthal. but the pace of disclosures slowed with a July release of just 2,206 pages.
State officials said the slowdown, which caused the agency to fall
short of a goal set by Contreras, was the result of new procedures to
make sure intelligence agencies were fully consulted about the content
of emails planned for release.
Officials had said in court filings that they planned to make up some of the deficit this month and to be back on track by next month. However, the new release of more than 7,000 pages would put the agency back in line with the judge's order now.
The monthly releases have generally been in chronological order. If that pattern holds up Monday, the new set should be largely from late 2009 and early 2010. However, some earlier records caught up in the classification review process are also expected to be in the new batch.
Clinton and her aides have suggested that as more of her emails are released, people will get a better sense of how she's doing her job and the controversy will diminish. That may turn out to be true as the monthly releases continue into next year. However, for now, each round of disclosures provides new fodder for Republicans and other critics questioning the wisdom, propriety and even the legality of the arrangement.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/clintonemail-batch4-213164#ixzz3kQoBjkOw
Officials had said in court filings that they planned to make up some of the deficit this month and to be back on track by next month. However, the new release of more than 7,000 pages would put the agency back in line with the judge's order now.
The monthly releases have generally been in chronological order. If that pattern holds up Monday, the new set should be largely from late 2009 and early 2010. However, some earlier records caught up in the classification review process are also expected to be in the new batch.
Clinton and her aides have suggested that as more of her emails are released, people will get a better sense of how she's doing her job and the controversy will diminish. That may turn out to be true as the monthly releases continue into next year. However, for now, each round of disclosures provides new fodder for Republicans and other critics questioning the wisdom, propriety and even the legality of the arrangement.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/clintonemail-batch4-213164#ixzz3kQoBjkOw
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/clintonemail-batch4-213164#ixzz3kQnsrHzy
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/clintonemail-batch4-213164#ixzz3kQnnHwBC
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου